Tuesday, December 30, 2008

Literacy in new media - Is it for the better or for the worse?

In the English speaking world, Britain alone generates well over 6 billion short message service (Sms) every month. It is therefore conspicuous enough that people are communicating more and faster than ever. However, these text messages are often cut short and therefore, consonants, vowels and punctuations are dropped. The natural reaction or rather worry to such a cause would be whether text messaging will produce generation of illiterates in the near future.

It is ironic as linguists are not the ones who are concerned about this matter but the teachers in school who have had to mark some some badly written write-ups . David Crystal , a linguist who came up with ' Txtng : the Gr8 db8' basically makes two general points :

  • The language of texting is hardly as deviant as people think
  • Texting actually makes young people better communicators, not worse.
Those two points aside, it is also almost impossible to accommodate a whole load of specifed information into a text message and therefore, several thousand of made-up words came about. The whole point is that , tailored text predates the text message. After all, who even knows what p.m really stands for? "post-meridiem", latin for "after midday".

I personally feel by knowing the different kinds of usage of english , be it in new-media terms ( electronic text messaging) or even in journalism short-hand, all of it are various ways of communication and it is our responsibility to be aware of it and learn accordingly . As for adults, they should educate the younger generation appropriately and not come across as questioning such language ability as a form of judgment. Logically, before you can learn how to write abbreviated forms effectively, one will need to have a sense of how the sounds of your language relates to the letters, as mentioned by David crystal in a written news article. In addition to that, statistics have also shown that the more adept children were at text messaging, the better they did in spelling and writing as they were more aware of what was and was not appropriate.

This whole issue of literacy in the new media still comes aross as a national controversy, but as long as we know our role in what is appropriate in english language , we will inevitably be more responsible for our way of educating ourselves and future generations.

19 comments:

  1. I think that we should really educate ourselves and the future generations in using appropriate english language, so that the we will not fall away(getting difficult) in communicating with people from around the world. As english language is the world standard for communication as most country uses it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sometimes I get so used to using SMS language that I will even write or type it out without noticing!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hello.

    Yes, I agree that the action of cutting short the SMSes would culminate in poor communication skills. However, truthfully speaking, SMS is like what its name implies, to enable users to send short messages.

    Sometimes, unwittingly, users keep the messages as short as possible so that the time to read the message is also kept shorter, and especially by keeping vowels off the words, more information can be conveyed in one SMS. Some may adopt this as a way to cut costs as many operators charge smses based on character-by-character basis where a pre-defined number of characters make up one sms:

    For example, an "i" and a "d" each takes up a character space in the word "friend", and sometimes an extra character as such would result in sending 2sms-es and getting charged for it respectively. One sms might not make much of a difference, but for those who send 50 sms-es a day, it would eventually sum up to quite alot. Thus, it would then be logical for users to replace the word "friend" with "fren" instead.

    However, its quite evident that users who are younger and younger in age, have been using this method of cutting out vowels and consonants from words. So it is reasonable to worry about the quality of language in these people who will lead the world in future. What is also worrying is the fact that young children have also begun to frequently use twit language:

    for example "you" instead of being shortened to "u" gets lengthened instead to "euuuu" and "me" gets lengthened to "miexx". The frequent usage of the letter "x" behind words puzzles many people too. Some sees it as a replacement for the letter "s", while some view that addition as a more affectionate way of communication. I personally feel that it adds variety to written languages.

    I learnt quite alot from your blog. =D Good writing.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I feel that when we are writing SMSes, we have the freedom to write what we want to sent to a recipient. It is not that it would graded like a composition. And we are sending to only a specific person, not the entire world. The keyword is "SHORT" message.

    I must agree that sometimes we accidentally write down short forms instead of the correct word. But the keyword is 'accidentally'. It is not that our English is deproving. To me, it is easier and faster to read words that are cut short.

    Wei Xi

    ReplyDelete
  6. Using short messaging, you just need to type a only few words to represent the original words however there are also side effects to it.

    To me, whenever i write a report i always put 'you' as 'u' and soon, it becomes a habit to me.

    ReplyDelete
  7. As you said, SMS stands for short message service. Why would anyone want to make it long? I personally feel that is it fine to use words that are cut short. This is because it saves time and energy.

    Also, I agree with the statement that texting makes young people better communicators. We are better in the sense that we can write shorter words that still retain the same meaning. Furthemore, it is way cooler than the old, boring words.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Everything has its pros and cons. Although using SMS can help to make communication more easy, it tends to make people to use short form. As people are too use of using short form, they will eventually use it on their written work.

    ReplyDelete
  9. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Although abbreviated forms may have many meanings, I still think abbreviated forms are better than writing the whole word out. Saves people the hassle of writing the whole word out, but instead giving the person reading it more trouble, as he has to decipher the meaning of the word.

    ReplyDelete
  11. time to kick away the old habit of using short forms and type proper English.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I agree with weiliang in that everything has its pros and cons. Short forms of words save us time and space in sms-es which in turn help us send information faster. Although generally speaking, the language itself would not be affected(as only the spelling is affected), these short forms could have more damaging effects.

    In countries where english is not the first language, these short forms could further damage one's command of english. I shall take our own Asian culture of using english as an example.

    English: Do you want to have dinner together?
    Text message singlish: Wan dinner 2gthr onot?

    That is not only degrading english but it's damaging one's command of english as well. In my opinion, if one is not confident of one's command of english, refrain from using short forms because one can improve oneself if correct english is used. If your command of english is good enough, feel free to use the short forms :)

    ReplyDelete
  13. Do you think sms-lg further complicates the language issues we already have in S'pore, what with Singlish and all?

    ReplyDelete
  14. I agree with jensen that if we type the whole sentence out rather than using short forms can take up all the unnecessary character spaces.

    I feel that SMS can be used in many different ways. Some people tend to make the word more longer or repeat the same vowels such as using 'miiex' instead of 'me'.

    I personally think that using proper English is better than short forms as for example, you are texting to your parents or someone of higher position they might not understand what you are trying to say.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Using short terms when 'msging' has become a bad habit which is stuck on us as we do this practically everyday. We should stop using these short forms and start using the dictionary input in the phone.

    -brandon

    ReplyDelete
  16. Good information on the topic.
    As long we know when and where to use this sort of languages appropriately, this would be fine.Formal/informal literacy plays a major role here.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Good topics!!! I felt that as long as the objective of the message is conveyed regardless of the proper spelling is acceptable in SMS.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I’ve already commented but didn’t include my name. So I’ll post it again.

    I have to admit I use the short forms occasionally when typing on the keyboard but when it comes to SMS, I don't use any. I use the dictionary input and can't be bothered to save new words into it anyway.

    Besides, I read at a slower pace when it comes to short forms. Have to decipher those words since I seldom use them.

    Ze Chuan

    ReplyDelete
  19. Interesting topics. I think that literacy is not quite important in new media. Like SMS, the point is that how to send SMS faster and at the same time the receiver could understand. As long as the two points has been achieved that is enough. No matter the user use short from ot other method to cut down the words, it doesn't affect. However, in formal artical short form is not allow. I think that's good.

    ReplyDelete